MLM
is not for me - I want my money back." Well that's okay. New legislation
in Oklahoma and Texas give you one year to think about it. And the industry
is following suit.
If the trends continue, we may see the vast majority of network marketing
companies offering the standard benefit of a one year 90 percent refund policy
to distributors who have decided that the opportunity was just not for them.
How does this work? Let's say you decide to join a network marketing company
that sells cosmetics or vitamins or consumer products and you buy inventory
to sell to your customers. Under the emerging policies ofmany companies, you
will have up to a year to second guess your decision, cancel your participation
in the opportunity, return your product, less a 10 percent handling charge,
and get your money back. Just try this trick with your stockbroker, realtor
or business broker.
A number of states with such multilevel marketing legislation, such as Maryland,
Massachusetts, Wyoming, Louisiana, Georgia, Oklahoma and Texas mandate varying
degrees of buybacks by network marketing companies. Even Puerto Rico has such
a statute. In the typical buyback legislation, companies are required to buy
back inventory and sales aids at 90% of net cost to terminating distributors.
Buyback periods range from 90 days to forever.
Over the years, many companies have adhered to the guidelines in these statutes,
some have complied only where required, and others have ignored the legislation.
Some companies charge back upline distributors for commissions paid on returned
merchandise, while others have deducted upline commissions from refunds, which
dramatically reduces the actual buyback refund. With such inconsistency and
growing incidents of "inventory loading abuse," many leaders in
the network marketing industry thought it was time to make a commitment to
self regulation and industry standards on buybacks. Such a move, it was thought,
would send a message to regulators that the industry can address its own problems
without new onerous regulation.
Thus, after sincere soul-searching and with some anxiety, member companies
of the Direct Selling Association adopted an ethics rule mandating buyback
policies for terminating distributors. Although many of the hundreds of network
marketing companies in the U.S. do not belong to the DSA, the DSA, a Washington
D.C.-based trade association, does claim more than 100 members, including
many of the largest companies in the industry. Adoption of the buyback standards
by DSA member companies will impact billions of dollars of annual sales and
millions of participating distributors. Because of the number of major companies
adopting such policies, the new rules will effectively be seen as a benchmark
and new industry standard for network marketing. In fact, the one year buyback
standard was the primary source for model legislation subsequently adopted
in Texas and Oklahoma (who in return also recognized legitimacy of "personal
use" by distributors - an issue important to the industry) - with other
states to follow.
The new standards parallel to a large extent buyback policies in many of the
states with such legislation. Under the new rules, companies must agree to
buy back from terminating distributors inventory and sales aids in resalable
condition for a period of 12 months from purchase at 90% of the net cost to
the distributor. Upline commissions may not be deducted from the refund. Promotional
items or products with seasonal or short lives are not subject to buyback
if companies disclose this fact to distributors in advance. In addition, and
importantly, the buybacks don't apply to two specific situations where distributor
manipulation is taking place: (1) where distributors are disposing of inventory
merely to switch to another company or move whole groups of distributors to
another competitor (the intent of the rule is to protect the individual who
wishes to leave the business, and believes he or she was mistaken in buying
more inventory than could be sold); and (2) where a distributor, in order
to qualify for a bonus or other benefit, has falsely certified that the previously
purchased inventory has been resold.
There is probably plenty of debate in the industry about the appropriate length
of time of the buyback. Many in the industry believe that distributors should
reasonably know in 60-90 days if the opportunity is not for them. Nevertheless,
in light of some regulatory positions that the buyback period should be unlimited,
the time period for the DSA rule was chosen at 12 months in order to make
a strong statement about the commitment of industry companies to look after
the welfare of its distributors.
Adoption of extended buyback rules have drawn applause and praise from state
regulators. Many believe that the creation of an industry standard would go
a long way toward answering criticism in their states about "hit and
run" and "rape and pillage" images of network marketing companies.
It was thought that adoption of such buyback standards by industry companies
would reduce the need for intervention and enforcement action by state agencies.
Good For
You
So what's the first question you should ask when you are recruited to a network
marketing opportunity? Ask to see in writing the company policy on buybacks
and refunds. The buyback and refund trends are great for those of you looking
for a new business opportunity. Don't expect anything but sympathy on your
stock losses from your stockbroker. But do expect something more concrete
from your network marketing opportunity.
Jeffrey A. Babener, the principal attorney in the Portland, Oregon law firm of Babener & Associates, represents many of the leading direct selling companies in the United States and abroad. His firm has focus on startup and emerging MLM companies. He has been adviser to such companies as Avon, Nikken, Discover Toys, NuSkin, Excel, Fuller Brush, Cell Tech, Kaire, Sunrider, Melaleuca, etc. He is editor of the industry resource internet site www.mlmlegal.com. He is a frequent lecturer and has been interviewed on the industry, and published, in many publications. Babener & Associates, 121 SW Morrison, Suite 1020 Portland, OR 97204, www.mlmlegal.com.
Educational Archives
Article Topics by:
MLM Consultant
Michael L. Sheffield
Academy of MLM
Cause Marketing
Choosing MLM Software
Closing The Sale
Communication
Compensation Plans
Comp Plan Conversion
Copycat Marketing
Creating Your Next Product
Creativity
Cross Sponsoring
Define Your Customers
Finding A Product or Service
Finding the Right MLM Software
Home Based Business
Keep Your Company Hot
Mission Statements
MLM Party Plan
MLM Strategies In Politics
Passion For Your Business
Product Pricing
Right Product Right Time
Replicating Web Sites
Starting Your MLM Company
Transition To MLM
MLM Legal Articles by
Jeffrey Babener
MLM Attorney
Cross-Sponsoring Rules
Distributor Rights
FTC and Advertising
Illegal Pyramids
Incorporating the Network Marketer
Marketing Materials Control
MLM Legal Issues
MLM and Sales Taxes
Noncompetition Agreements
Taxes In the New Millenium
The 70% Rule
The Amway Safeguard Rule
Who Owns the Downline?
Other MLM Articles:
An MLM Curriculum
Capitalism In Russia
Hosting An Event
Is Your Comp Plan Stale?
Let's Get This Party Started
Picture Perfect Regognition
Sheffield Resource Network
Supply Chain Management
Why Distributors Quit
Q&A for MLM Distributors
by Topic:
Building a sales organization
Building your MLM business
Can MLM compete with retail?
Choose the best product to sell
Closing the sale
Direct Sales vs. MLM
Finding the right MLM company
Generating leads
How recessions effect MLM
Is MLM a scam?
Is MLM really easy and lucrative?
MLM Product packaging vs. retail
Overcoming objections
Polishing your phone sales
Protecting your downline
Questions to ask before joining
Reach out and sponsor
Replicating Web Sites
Start your MLM business right
What to look for in an opportunity
Which sales approach fits you?
Why some MLMs fail
