The
question of "rights in the downline" is one which is clearly headed
for the courts within the next few years. Many MLM companies take the position
that they are the sole owners of "downlines." Many key distributors
market their "downline structures" from one MLM company to another
as if downline structure was a piece of property which could be marketed at
will. When the "process" of multilevel, as a form of marketing is
closely examined, the better argument is probably that neither of these positions
is correct.
Multilevel marketing is a form of one-on-one direct selling by which companies
contract with independent distributors to market products and compensate those
distributors through sales commissions on sale of product produced by their
sales organization, as well as offering distributors the opportunity to profit
through the differential between wholesale and retail price. A downline is,
in reality, a sales organization made up of independent distributors. It is
not owned by key distributors, nor is it owned by an MLM company. Independent
distributors are free to cancel participation at any time. In fact, those
states that have adopted multilevel distribution statutes require that distributors
be permitted to cancel participation at any time, for any reason upon notice
to the company.
Most companies have adopted sophisticated data processing which provides detailed
information on downline sales organizations. In the event a distributor leaves
an organization, a company is obviously free to continue marketing through
its system of independent distributors. Modern thinking MLM companies also
provide availability of data processing information on the sales organization
in the distributor's downline. In fact, providing such information is tangible
evidence a company may offer to regulatory authorities that its distributors
are well informed as to their downline sales organizations. This indicates
that the distributor plays a bona fide supervisory selling soliciting function
in moving product to consumers. Many statutes now require this bona fide supervisory
function as a precondition to receipt of commissions or overrides by distributors.
Distributors are free to use information as to their own sales organization
as they deem appropriate subject to restrictions regarding confidential information.
Companies which attempt to restrict distributors after termination from working
with other MLM organizations should seriously consider the federal and state
antitrust implications of such restrictions. In California, for instance,
noncompete agreements are unenforceable unless based on confidential information.
Companies may not arbitrarily terminate distributors without facing liability.
Distributors enter into contracts with companies in reliance on the fact that
they will be compensated for building sales organizations. Although many MLM
companies adopt one year contracts with distributors, arbitrary or capricious
termination of the distributor may clearly subject companies to contract claims
as well as possible claims under various state dealer termination statutes.
It should also be noted that, in recent years, many state courts have gone
so far as to even award damages to "at will" employees, i.e., employees
who are not under contract with the company. This line of cases, which has
developed claims for "wrongful termination," has produced sizeable
awards of both compensatory and punitive damages. Such cases involving MLM
companies are still in developmental stages.
Jeffrey A. Babener, the principal attorney in the Portland, Oregon law firm of Babener & Associates, represents many of the leading direct selling companies in the United States and abroad. His firm has focus on startup and emerging MLM companies. He has been adviser to such companies as Avon, Nikken, Discover Toys, NuSkin, Excel, Fuller Brush, Cell Tech, Kaire, Sunrider, Melaleuca, etc. He is editor of the industry resource internet site www.mlmlegal.com. He is a frequent lecturer and has been interviewed on the industry, and published, in many publications. Babener & Associates, 121 SW Morrison, Suite 1020 Portland, OR 97204, www.mlmlegal.com
Educational Archives
Article Topics by:
MLM Consultant
Michael L. Sheffield
Academy of MLM
Cause Marketing
Choosing MLM Software
Closing The Sale
Communication
Compensation Plans
Comp Plan Conversion
Copycat Marketing
Creating Your Next Product
Creativity
Cross Sponsoring
Define Your Customers
Finding A Product or Service
Finding the Right MLM Software
Home Based Business
Keep Your Company Hot
Mission Statements
MLM Party Plan
MLM Strategies In Politics
Passion For Your Business
Product Pricing
Right Product Right Time
Replicating Web Sites
Starting Your MLM Company
Transition To MLM
MLM Legal Articles by
Jeffrey Babener
MLM Attorney
Cross-Sponsoring Rules
Distributor Rights
FTC and Advertising
Illegal Pyramids
Incorporating the Network Marketer
Marketing Materials Control
MLM Legal Issues
MLM and Sales Taxes
Noncompetition Agreements
Taxes In the New Millenium
The 70% Rule
The Amway Safeguard Rule
Who Owns the Downline?
Other MLM Articles:
An MLM Curriculum
Capitalism In Russia
Hosting An Event
Is Your Comp Plan Stale?
Let's Get This Party Started
Picture Perfect Regognition
Sheffield Resource Network
Supply Chain Management
Why Distributors Quit
Q&A for MLM Distributors
by Topic:
Building a sales organization
Building your MLM business
Can MLM compete with retail?
Choose the best product to sell
Closing the sale
Direct Sales vs. MLM
Finding the right MLM company
Generating leads
How recessions effect MLM
Is MLM a scam?
Is MLM really easy and lucrative?
MLM Product packaging vs. retail
Overcoming objections
Polishing your phone sales
Protecting your downline
Questions to ask before joining
Reach out and sponsor
Replicating Web Sites
Start your MLM business right
What to look for in an opportunity
Which sales approach fits you?
Why some MLMs fail
